<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polyamory and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.religionwriter.com/faith-life/polyamory/polyamory-and-the-same-sex-marriage-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.religionwriter.com/faith-life/polyamory/polyamory-and-the-same-sex-marriage-debate/</link>
	<description>Fresh Ideas on Religion in Whole-Grain Journalism Form</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette Tester</title>
		<link>http://www.religionwriter.com/faith-life/polyamory/polyamory-and-the-same-sex-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.religionwriter.com/uncategorized/polyamory-and-the-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-720</guid>
		<description>I like this article. It is clear to understand that the UU church is not at this time promoting multiple marraige. Years ago in the 60s this issue came up. The money gets complicaed and the government in my opinion just wants to keep it simple for tax purposes.
 An interesting idea would be a town who all &quot;got married&quot; together to get child education tax breaks,ect..LOL. Great idea for poor single women with children.Marry each other and have 6 kids, rather than each have 3. The youngest ones would get WIC and the overall income for a family of 8 would keep them qualified for medicaid and food stamps.Housing vouchers as well. (LOL, Maryland counties are at limit and vouchers not being given)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this article. It is clear to understand that the UU church is not at this time promoting multiple marraige. Years ago in the 60s this issue came up. The money gets complicaed and the government in my opinion just wants to keep it simple for tax purposes.<br />
 An interesting idea would be a town who all &#8220;got married&#8221; together to get child education tax breaks,ect..LOL. Great idea for poor single women with children.Marry each other and have 6 kids, rather than each have 3. The youngest ones would get WIC and the overall income for a family of 8 would keep them qualified for medicaid and food stamps.Housing vouchers as well. (LOL, Maryland counties are at limit and vouchers not being given)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
